-----Original Message-----
From: smb(_at_)cs(_dot_)columbia(_dot_)edu
[mailto:smb(_at_)cs(_dot_)columbia(_dot_)edu]
In message <200509271059(_dot_)GAA29066(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>, "Nick Staff"
writes:
]
] 7.2 Approval to block participant on a WG list (Bert
Wijnen) ] ] This management issue was discussed. The IESG agrees
that Bert ] Wijnen may block posting rights for Dean
Anderson on the
dnsops ] mailing list if he refuses to stay on topic as
per the list
rules.
which raises the question, "Why are we even discussing this?"
--
John Leslie <john(_at_)jlc(_dot_)net>
John-
Could you please specify the RFC that details the procedure
for when an
AD requests that the IESG remove someone's posting
privileges from the
IETF list (the RFC other 3683 of course). If there isn't
one then I'd
have to ask that you refrain from making wildly unsupported
claims as
they are disruptive to the process.
Have a look at 3934.
--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
Steve,
I might have misunderstood it, but I thought 3934 only pertained to
suspension from a Working Group list and that since David's request included
suspension from the main IETF list that it fell under 3683?
nick
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf