Hi,
I can agree with SHOULD and SHOULD NOT, the only problem i had in
writing it that way is i could not meet the specification requirement
for specifying the conditions under which the requirement would not
apply. I did not want to careless create loopholes.
My main concern is that these issues be a formal requirement of the
community's decision in where we meet. And that they be taken
seriously.
a.
On 17 okt 2005, at 21.50, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Sam Hartman wrote:
"Avri" == Avri Doria <avri(_at_)acm(_dot_)org> writes:
Avri> - MUST NOT be held in a country whose visa requirements are
Avri> so stringent as to make it impossible or even extremely
Avri> difficult for some participant to attend.
I think this is too strict. I think visa criteria are an issue, but
saying that visa criteria prevent one participant from attending
seems
way too strict.
More generally, any non-trivial set of MUST NOTs is going to be
impossible to satisfy simultaneously. I really don't see how we can
go further than should/should not, in practical reality.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf