Re: Process for Process Change

ietf

Re: Process for Process Change

2005-11-17 13:35:55

We do have a process for process change.  We can approve a BCP using
the procedure outlined in RFC 2026.

When we can get a strong consensus behind a process change, that
procedure works reasonably well.

There are other cases where it doesn't work well.  Some of us think
that's OK; some of us don't.

--Sam


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Process for Process Change (Was Diagrams ((Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)), Ash, Gerald R \(Jerry\), ALABS Re: Process for Process Change, Sam Hartman <= Re: Process for Process Change, Spencer Dawkins Re: Process for Process Change (Was Diagrams ((Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)), Bob Braden RE: Process for Process Change (Was Diagrams ((Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)), Gray, Eric

Previous by Date:	Re: Diagrams, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Next by Date:	RE: Diagrams, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Previous by Thread:	Process for Process Change (Was Diagrams ((Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)), Ash, Gerald R \(Jerry\), ALABS
Next by Thread:	Re: Process for Process Change, Spencer Dawkins
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]