IETF Discussion (date)
November 30, 2005
- Re: Internationalization by ASCII art (was Re: I-D file formats and internationalization), Robert Sayre, 21:52
- Internationalization by ASCII art (was Re: I-D file formats and internationalization), Masataka Ohta, 21:20
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Paul Hoffman, 19:35
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Douglas Otis, 19:00
- RE: Why are we so exceptional [was: Translations of standards (was: RE: ASCII art)], JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 18:05
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Frank Ellermann, 16:21
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Paul Hoffman, 15:35
- RE: I-D file formats and internationalization, Bob Braden, 15:09
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Bob Braden, 15:03
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Douglas Otis, 14:56
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Frank Ellermann, 14:05
- Update: IETF Trust Consensus Call, Lucy E. Lynch, 13:27
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Douglas Otis, 13:15
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Henning Schulzrinne, 12:52
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Tony Hansen, 12:20
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Jeroen Massar, 12:11
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Mark Baugher, 12:07
- RE: Why are we so exceptional [was: Translations of standards (was: RE: ASCII art)], Burger, Eric, 12:01
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Eliot Lear, 11:58
- RE: I-D file formats and internationalization, Nelson, David, 11:49
- RE: I-D file formats and internationalization, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:45
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Eduardo Mendez, 11:07
- Re: I-D file formats and internationalization, Ole Jacobsen, 09:34
- RE: EARLY submission deadline - Fact or Fiction?, Gray, Eric, 09:08
- Re: EARLY submission deadline - Fact or Fiction?, 'Scott W Brim', 08:39
- RE: EARLY submission deadline - Fact or Fiction?, Gray, Eric, 08:11
- Re: ASCII art, Stewart Bryant, 07:00
- Re: EARLY submission deadline - Fact or Fiction?, Scott W Brim, 06:41
- I-D file formats and internationalization, Robert Sayre, 06:21
- RE: Printing IDs and RFCs (Was: Re: ASCII art), Yaakov Stein, 02:34
- RE: Printing IDs and RFCs (Was: Re: ASCII art), Yaakov Stein, 02:23
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call:'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to ProposedStandard], Sam Hartman, 01:56
November 29, 2005
- RE: DHCID and the use of MD5, Gray, Eric, 15:43
- RE: EARLY submission deadline - Fact or Fiction?, Gray, Eric, 15:36
- Re: Printing IDs and RFCs (Was: Re: ASCII art), Geoff Huston, 15:36
- Re: DHCID and the use of MD5, Russ Housley, 15:29
- Re: Printing IDs and RFCs (Was: Re: ASCII art), Henrik Levkowetz, 15:06
- Re: Printing IDs and RFCs (Was: Re: ASCII art), Henrik Levkowetz, 15:04
- Re: Last Call: 'Kerberized Internet Negotiation of Keys (KINK)' to Proposed Standard (fwd), Nicolas Williams, 15:03
- RE: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Gray, Eric, 14:56
- Re: EARLY submission deadline - Fact or Fiction?, Joel M. Halpern, 14:36
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Dave Crocker, 14:05
- Re: Last Call: 'Kerberized Internet Negotiation of Keys (KINK)' to Proposed Standard (fwd), Sam Hartman, 13:43
- RE: EARLY submission deadline - Fact or Fiction?, Gray, Eric, 13:22
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Bob Braden, 13:21
- Re: EARLY submission deadline - Fact or Fiction?, Dave Crocker, 13:07
- Re: EARLY submission deadline - Fact or Fiction?, kent crispin, 12:56
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Sam Hartman, 12:50
- RE: EARLY submission deadline - Fact or Fiction?, Gray, Eric, 12:48
- RE: Printing IDs and RFCs (Was: Re: ASCII art), Geoff Huston, 12:44
- Re: EARLY submission deadline - Fact or Fiction?, Dave Crocker, 12:33
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Geoff Huston, 12:30
- RE: EARLY submission deadline - Fact or Fiction?, Gray, Eric, 12:28
- Re: DHCID and the use of MD5, Bill Fenner, 12:00
- Re: EARLY submission deadline - Fact or Fiction?, Marshall Eubanks, 11:57
- Re: Last Call: 'Kerberized Internet Negotiation of Keys (KINK)' to Proposed Standard (fwd), Nicolas Williams, 11:47
- RE: EARLY submission deadline - Fact or Fiction?, Gray, Eric, 11:41
- RE: EARLY submission deadline - Fact or Fiction?, Gray, Eric, 11:28
- Re: EARLY submission deadline - Fact or Fiction?, Marshall Eubanks, 11:27
- Re: EARLY submission deadline - Fact or Fiction?, Dave Crocker, 11:13
- Re: DHCID and the use of MD5, Sam Hartman, 10:54
- RE: EARLY submission deadline - Fact or Fiction?, Gray, Eric, 10:35
- Re: DHCID and the use of MD5, Russ Housley, 10:28
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call:'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to ProposedStandard], Mark Stapp, 10:22
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Mark Stapp, 10:19
- Re: DHCID and the use of MD5, Paul Hoffman, 10:11
- Re: EARLY submission deadline (Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art)), Dave Crocker, 09:52
- Re: DHCID and the use of MD5, Sam Hartman, 09:47
- Re: DHCID and the use of MD5, Russ Housley, 09:26
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Ted Faber, 09:23
- Re: DHCID and the use of MD5, Sam Hartman, 09:21
- Re: DHCID and the use of MD5, Russ Housley, 08:49
- Re: ASCII art, Yaakov Stein, 08:38
- Re: DHCID and the use of MD5, Russ Housley, 08:30
- RE: Printing IDs and RFCs (Was: Re: ASCII art), Yaakov Stein, 08:18
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), John C Klensin, 08:16
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Ted Lemon, 06:46
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Ted Lemon, 06:46
- Re: [dhcwg] DHCP and FQDN conflicts [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], David W. Hankins, 06:45
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call:'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to ProposedStandard], Ted Lemon, 06:42
- Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Ted Lemon, 06:40
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], David W. Hankins, 06:38
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Ted Lemon, 06:38
- Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Ted Lemon, 06:32
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Marshall Rose, 06:28
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Brian E Carpenter, 04:01
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Julian Reschke, 02:02
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Julian Reschke, 02:01
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 00:27
November 28, 2005
- RE: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 23:40
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Steven M. Bellovin, 22:03
- RE: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Randy Presuhn, 21:52
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call:'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to ProposedStandard], Mark Andrews, 21:50
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Joe Abley, 20:48
- RE: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:01
- RE: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call:'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to ProposedStandard], Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:01
- RE: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Bernie Volz \(volz\), 15:46
- RE: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Bernie Volz \(volz\), 15:22
- RE: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 15:18
- RE: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Bernie Volz \(volz\), 15:17
- RE: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution ofFQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Bernie Volz \(volz\), 15:01
- Re: EARLY submission deadline (Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art)), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 13:42
- Choice of crypto, was resolution etc,, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:42
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Dave Crocker, 13:23
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Dave Crocker, 13:10
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Bob Braden, 13:03
- RE: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Christian Huitema, 12:55
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Dave Crocker, 12:34
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Bob Braden, 11:58
- Re: [dhcwg] DHCP and FQDN conflicts [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Sam Hartman, 11:16
- RE: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:38
- RE: [dhcwg] DHCP and FQDN conflicts [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Bernie Volz \(volz\), 10:15
- Re: EARLY submission deadline (Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art)), Dave Crocker, 10:09
- Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Steven M. Bellovin, 09:53
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Marshall Rose, 09:27
- Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Ted Lemon, 09:16
- Re: Reviewing the IPR Trust aggreement, Brian E Carpenter, 08:29
- Re: Reviewing the IPR Trust aggreement, John C Klensin, 08:01
- Re: Reviewing the IPR Trust aggreement, Bernard Aboba, 07:18
- RE: [dhcwg] DHCP and FQDN conflicts [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Pekka Savola, 01:44
November 27, 2005
- Re: Update: IETF Trust Consensus Call, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 23:31
- RE: [dhcwg] DHCP and FQDN conflicts [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Bernie Volz \(volz\), 19:39
- RE: [dhcwg] Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Bernie Volz \(volz\), 19:30
- Re: Update: IETF Trust Consensus Call, Geoff Huston, 18:44
- Re: Update: IETF Trust Consensus Call, John C Klensin, 16:00
- Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Sam Hartman, 15:23
- Re: EARLY submission deadline (Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art)), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 04:55
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Brian E Carpenter, 04:12
- RE: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 03:45
- Re: EARLY submission deadline (Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art)), Brian E Carpenter, 01:41
November 26, 2005
- Re: email "Common Operating Group", Dave Crocker, 15:12
- Re: EARLY submission deadline (Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art)), Eliot Lear, 15:11
- Re: email "Common Operating Group", Dave Crocker, 15:04
- Re: Update: IETF Trust Consensus Call, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 14:17
- Re: EARLY submission deadline (Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art)), Doug Royer, 14:15
- EARLY submission deadline (Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art)), Dave Crocker, 12:42
- Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Pekka Savola, 12:14
- Re: grow: Last Call: 'Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR): The Internet Address Assignment and Aggregation Plan' to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley, 10:41
- Re: DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Steven M. Bellovin, 10:03
- RE: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Paul Hoffman, 09:38
- Re: grow: Last Call: 'Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR): The Internet Address Assignment and Aggregation Plan' to Proposed Standard, Pekka Savola, 09:35
- DHCP and FQDN conflicts [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Pekka Savola, 07:32
- DHCID and the use of MD5 [Re: Last Call: 'Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients' to Proposed Standard], Pekka Savola, 07:29
- Last Call: 'Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR): The Internet Address Assignment and Aggregation Plan' to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann, 06:19
- RE: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), John C Klensin, 02:55
- Re: Update: IETF Trust Consensus Call, John C Klensin, 02:55
November 25, 2005
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Ned Freed, 18:00
- Re: Community review requested of SOW for Secretariat and Meeting Services, Dave Crocker, 13:26
- RE: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 12:43
- RE: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Paul Hoffman, 11:48
- Security Area Response to Hash Function "Breaks", Russ Housley, 10:29
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Eliot Lear, 09:35
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Dave Crocker, 08:46
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Eliot Lear, 02:14
November 24, 2005
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Dave Crocker, 22:59
- RE: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Christian Huitema, 22:16
- Re: Update: IETF Trust Consensus Call, Geoff Huston, 17:54
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Doug Ewell, 12:00
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Steven M. Bellovin, 10:44
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Douglas Otis, 10:28
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Bill Fenner, 10:20
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Dave Crocker, 09:18
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Dave Crocker, 09:15
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Steven M. Bellovin, 08:58
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Henning Schulzrinne, 08:04
- RE: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 08:00
- RE: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 07:55
- RE: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 07:54
November 23, 2005
- Re: Henning's proposal (Re: ASCII art), Joe Touch, 21:59
- Re: Henning's proposal (Re: ASCII art), John C Klensin, 21:14
- Re: Henning's proposal (Re: ASCII art), Tony Hansen, 20:51
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), John C Klensin, 18:36
- Re: Update: IETF Trust Consensus Call, Lucy E. Lynch, 18:14
- Re: Henning's proposal (Re: ASCII art), Bill Fenner, 17:33
- Re: Henning's proposal (Re: ASCII art), John C Klensin, 16:29
- Community review requested of SOW for Secretariat and Meeting Services, Ray Pelletier, 16:00
- Re: Update: IETF Trust Consensus Call, Dave Crocker, 15:48
- Re: Henning's proposal (Re: ASCII art), Henning Schulzrinne, 15:05
- Re: Henning's proposal (Re: ASCII art), Joe Touch, 15:02
- Re: Update: IETF Trust Consensus Call, Scott Bradner, 14:31
- Update: IETF Trust Consensus Call, Lucy E. Lynch, 14:25
- RE: ASCII art, Dassa, 13:56
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Spencer Dawkins, 13:03
- RE: ASCII art, Johnny Eriksson, 12:57
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Henrik Levkowetz, 12:48
- Re: Henning's proposal (Re: ASCII art), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 12:45
- Re: Henning's proposal (Re: ASCII art), Ted Faber, 12:43
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Dave Crocker, 12:41
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Henning Schulzrinne, 12:29
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Eliot Lear, 12:29
- Re: Henning's proposal (Re: ASCII art), Henning Schulzrinne, 12:29
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Spencer Dawkins, 12:18
- Re: ASCII art, Masataka Ohta, 12:07
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Tony Hansen, 11:52
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Dave Crocker, 11:52
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Henning Schulzrinne, 11:25
- Re: Reviewing the IPR Trust agreement (was: Re: [IAOC] Re: A couple of questions about the IETF trust outbound licensing.), Lucy E. Lynch, 11:19
- Printing IDs and RFCs (Was: Re: ASCII art), Henrik Levkowetz, 11:04
- Re: XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Dave Crocker, 11:04
- RE: Henning's proposal (Re: ASCII art), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:21
- XML2RFC submission (was Re: ASCII art), Spencer Dawkins, 10:15
- Re: ASCII art, Ted Faber, 10:10
- RE: ASCII art, Gray, Eric, 09:31
- RE: ASCII art, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:14
- Henning's proposal (Re: ASCII art), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 09:09
- Re: ASCII art, Ted Faber, 08:27
- Re: ASCII art, Henning Schulzrinne, 08:00
- RE: ASCII art, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:40
- Re: ASCII art, Eliot Lear, 07:18
- Re: ASCII art, william(at)elan.net, 07:16
- RE: ASCII art, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 06:35
- Re: ASCII art, Dave Aronson (re IETF), 06:22
- Re: ASCII art, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 05:38
- Re: ASCII art, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 04:21
- Re: Last Call: 'Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR): The Internet Address Assignment and Aggregation Plan' to Proposed Standard, Tim Chown, 03:53
- RE: Process for Process Change (Was Diagrams ((Was RFCs should bedistributed in XML)), Lars-Erik Jonsson (LU/EAB), 01:07
November 22, 2005
- RE: ASCII art, Yaakov Stein, 23:37
- Re: ASCII art, Ted Faber, 11:30
- RE: ASCII art, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:16
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML, Doug Ewell, 07:43
- RE: RFCs should be distributed in XML, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 07:05
- Reviewing the IPR Trust agreement (was: Re: [IAOC] Re: A couple of questions about the IETF trust outbound licensing.), John C Klensin, 06:43
- Re: ASCII art, Julien . Maisonneuve, 03:29
- Language philosophy (RE: ASCII art), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 01:18
November 21, 2005
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML, Doug Ewell, 21:19
- Why are we so exceptional [was: Translations of standards (was: RE: ASCII art)], JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 18:13
- Re: ASCII art, Spencer Dawkins, 16:25
- Re: ASCII art, Douglas Otis, 16:06
- Re: ASCII art, Masataka Ohta, 12:54
- RE: Translations of standards (was: RE: ASCII art), John C Klensin, 12:53
- RE: Translations of standards (was: RE: ASCII art), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:22
- Translations of standards (was: RE: ASCII art), John C Klensin, 11:54
- RE: ASCII art, Thomas Gal, 11:42
- RE: ASCII art, Thomas Gal, 11:15
- Re: ASCII art, codewarrior, 10:11
- Re: ASCII art, Ole Jacobsen, 09:47
- Re: ASCII art, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 09:33
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Bill Sommerfeld, 08:40
- Re: ASCII art, Paul Hoffman, 08:13
- RE: Last time we went to Dallas, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:10
- Re: ASCII art, Julien . Maisonneuve, 02:01
November 19, 2005
- Re: Last time we went to Dallas, Theodore Ts'o, 14:03
- Re: Last time we went to Dallas, Bill Sommerfeld, 10:35
- Re: [Fwd: Requirements for Open IESG Positions], Alexey Melnikov, 09:51
- Re: Last time we went to Dallas, Eliot Lear, 09:31
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Cameron Kerr, 00:25
November 18, 2005
- Last time we went to Dallas, Ole Jacobsen, 23:58
- Re: ASCII art, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 15:51
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Ted Faber, 09:46
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Marshall Eubanks, 08:42
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Juergen Schoenwaelder, 01:18
November 17, 2005
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas --web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Masataka Ohta, 17:53
- Re: ASCII art, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 17:32
- RE: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas --web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Lakshminath Dondeti, 17:16
- Re: ASCII art, Lee Mahan, 16:25
- ASCII art (was: lots of other threads), Paul Hoffman, 15:54
- RE: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas --web public ation in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Gray, Eric, 15:44
- Re: Process for Process Change, Spencer Dawkins, 15:19
- RE: Process for Process Change (Was Diagrams ((Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)), Gray, Eric, 15:01
- Re: Process for Process Change (Was Diagrams ((Was RFCs should bedistributed in XML)), Sam Hartman, 14:52
- RE: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas --web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:44
- RE: Process for Process Change (Was Diagrams ((Was RFCs should bedistributed in XML)), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:43
- RE: Diagrams, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:31
- Re: Process for Process Change, Sam Hartman, 13:35
- Re: Diagrams, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 11:44
- Re: Process for Process Change (Was Diagrams ((Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)), Bob Braden, 11:39
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Ted Faber, 10:25
- RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:22
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Steve Crocker, 10:11
- Re: Diagrams, Frank Ellermann, 10:10
- RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:57
- RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Gray, Eric, 09:31
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Steve Crocker, 09:28
- RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Gray, Eric, 09:21
- RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:17
- Process for Process Change (Was Diagrams ((Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)), Ash, Gerald R \(Jerry\), ALABS, 06:35
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Masataka Ohta, 06:32
- RE: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 04:29
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Stewart Bryant, 03:16
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Juergen Schoenwaelder, 01:32
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Juergen Schoenwaelder, 01:26
- Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Avri Doria, 01:19
November 16, 2005
- RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Yaakov Stein, 23:56
- Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Randy Presuhn, 19:33
- Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 17:33
- RE: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Gray, Eric, 17:04
- RE: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 16:33
- test, 文 雯, 15:12
- Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Jari Arkko, 14:49
- Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, John C Klensin, 13:47
- Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Jari Arkko, 13:36
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Bill Fenner, 13:30
- Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Lakshminath Dondeti, 13:23
- Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Jari Arkko, 13:18
- Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, John C Klensin, 12:15
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Bob Braden, 11:43
- Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Lakshminath Dondeti, 11:15
- Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Lakshminath Dondeti, 11:08
- RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Gray, Eric, 11:05
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Ted Faber, 10:48
- RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Gray, Eric, 10:45
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Ted Faber, 10:43
- Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 10:14
- Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Jari Arkko, 09:34
- Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Lakshminath Dondeti, 09:29
- Re: email "Common Operating Group", Sam Hartman, 09:12
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Masataka Ohta, 09:04
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Marshall Eubanks, 09:03
- Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Brian E Carpenter, 08:57
- Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion, Brian E Carpenter, 08:39
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Stewart Bryant, 07:51
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Masataka Ohta, 07:08
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Stewart Bryant, 05:33
- Re: Diagrams, Frank Ellermann, 05:15
- Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion, Steven M. Bellovin, 01:21
- Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 01:06
- Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion, Carsten Bormann, 00:56
November 15, 2005
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publi cation in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Cullen Jennings, 22:13
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publi cation in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Henrik Levkowetz, 17:09
- Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion, Paul Hoffman, 17:09
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publi cation in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Alia Atlas, 16:03
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publi cation in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Spencer Dawkins, 15:59
- Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion, Marshall Eubanks, 14:53
- Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion, Lixia Zhang, 14:36
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publi cation in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Henrik Levkowetz, 14:32
- Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 13:50
- Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 13:43
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publi cation in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Anthony G. Atkielski, 13:23
- Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion, Spencer Dawkins, 13:06
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publi cation in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Julian Reschke, 12:40
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publi cation in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Carsten Bormann, 12:35
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- webpublication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Randy Presuhn, 12:33
- Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Lakshminath Dondeti, 12:25
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publi cation in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Bill Fenner, 11:48
- Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion, codewarrior, 11:44
- Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Eric Rescorla, 11:41
- RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:32
- Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion, Joel Jaeggli, 11:28
- Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion, Geoff Huston, 11:21
- Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion, Alexandru Petrescu, 11:18
- Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion, Joel Jaeggli, 11:17
- Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion, Alexandru Petrescu, 11:15
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publi cation in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Juergen Schoenwaelder, 10:51
- RE: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Joel Jaeggli, 10:47
- Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, John C Klensin, 10:32
- Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 10:23
- RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Bob Braden, 10:23
- Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Scott W Brim, 10:11
- RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:11
- Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion, Marshall Eubanks, 10:08
- RE: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publi cation in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 10:05
- Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 09:53
- Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Eliot Lear, 09:53
- Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion, John, 09:35
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Simon Josefsson, 09:29
- RE: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Dondeti, Lakshminath, 09:19
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Steven M. Bellovin, 08:58
- Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Eliot Lear, 08:50
- RE: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Dondeti, Lakshminath, 08:45
- RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Lars-Erik Jonsson (LU/EAB), 07:22
- LAST Call for Nominations, NomCom05, Ralph Droms, 07:12
- Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Eliot Lear, 04:26
- RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Yaakov Stein, 01:16
November 14, 2005
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Anthony G. Atkielski, 23:08
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Anthony G. Atkielski, 23:03
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Anthony G. Atkielski, 22:59
- Re: Diagrams, Frank Ellermann, 21:57
- Re: email "Common Operating Group", Sam Hartman, 17:26
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Bill Fenner, 17:04
- On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Lakshminath Dondeti, 17:00
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Gary E. Miller, 16:13
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Joe Touch, 15:57
- Re: email "Common Operating Group", Dave Crocker, 15:53
- Re: email "Common Operating Group", Tony Finch, 15:34
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Randy.Dunlap, 15:10
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), kent crispin, 14:58
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Stewart Bryant, 14:32
- Re: email "Common Operating Group", Keith Moore, 14:21
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Bob Braden, 14:16
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Stewart Bryant, 13:42
- RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Bob Braden, 12:53
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Julian Reschke, 12:51
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Dave Crocker, 12:48
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Jari Arkko, 12:42
- RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Gray, Eric, 12:34
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Bill Fenner, 12:25
- Re: email "Common Operating Group", Frank Ellermann, 12:22
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Stewart Bryant, 12:16
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Stewart Bryant, 12:12
- RE: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Yaakov Stein, 11:55
- RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Yaakov Stein, 11:42
- Re: Vancouver schedule, Barry Leiba, 11:33
- RE: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Andrew G. Malis, 11:27
- email "Common Operating Group", Dave Crocker, 10:42
- RE: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Joel Jaeggli, 10:31
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Dave Crocker, 10:28
- Re: draft-hutzler-spamops-05.txt, Bill Sommerfeld, 10:22
- RE: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Gray, Eric, 10:19
- Re: draft-hutzler-spamops-05.txt, Frank Ellermann, 10:17
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Andrew Sullivan, 10:17
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Jari Arkko, 10:14
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Andrew Sullivan, 09:43
- Re: draft-hutzler-spamops-05.txt, Dave Crocker, 09:39
- Re: draft-hutzler-spamops-05.txt, Dave Crocker, 08:45
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: 'ECC Cipher Suites for TLS' to Informational RFC, Bodo Moeller, 07:58
- Re: Monday 0800 Streaming efforts for IETF64 redux, Doug Ewell, 07:57
- Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Michael Mealling, 07:57
- Re: Vancouver schedule, Eric Allman, 07:56
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Doug Ewell, 07:56
- On-site "Well Known Addresses", David Mitton, 07:56
- Re: Unsure of WLAN diagnosis (Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode), Barry Leiba, 07:55
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: 'ECC Cipher Suites for TLS' to Informational RFC, Douglas Stebila, 07:54
- draft-rescorla-dtls-05.txt, Rob Dugal, 07:53
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Doug Ewell, 07:52
- Re: [TLS] draft-rescorla-dtls-05.txt, Eric Rescorla, 07:52
- Re: Vancouver schedule, Eric Rescorla, 07:51
- Re: Monday 0800 Streaming efforts for IETF64 redux, Doug Ewell, 07:50
- Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Steve Crocker, 07:41
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Stewart Bryant, 07:02
- 3xx for Re-Invite, Shweta . Kavishwar, 05:40
- draft-hutzler-spamops-05.txt, Pekka Savola, 00:19
November 12, 2005
- Re: Unsure of WLAN diagnosis (Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode), Joel Jaeggli, 22:44
- Re: Unsure of WLAN diagnosis (Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode), Joel Jaeggli, 22:30
- Re: Bounces from nomcom05 mailing list?, Frank Ellermann, 15:26
- Re: Bounces from nomcom05 mailing list?, Ralph Droms, 15:02
- Re: Bounces from nomcom05 mailing list?, Frank Ellermann, 14:36
- Re: a msg to someone who may not see it, Frank Ellermann, 14:28
- Unsure of WLAN diagnosis (Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 14:23
- Re: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria - weather conditions and related - 2nd round, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 13:12
- RE: IEEE vs IETF (one more time) was RE: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\), 10:44
- IEEE vs IETF (one more time) was RE: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Brett Thorson, 10:22
- Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Marshall Eubanks, 08:39
- RE: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Andrew G. Malis, 08:16
November 11, 2005
- RE: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\), 22:39
- Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Marshall Eubanks, 22:14
- RE: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\), 21:56
- Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Avri Doria, 19:21
- Re: Bounces from nomcom05 mailing list?, Ralph Droms, 18:52
- a msg to someone who may not see it, Lixia Zhang, 18:02
- RE: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Nelson, David, 16:00
- RE: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:41
- Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Jasper Bryant-Greene, 13:51
- Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Andrew Daviel, 13:24
- Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion, Paul Hoffman, 12:03
- RE: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Ole Jacobsen, 12:00
- Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Marshall Eubanks, 11:43
- Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Henning Schulzrinne, 11:28
- Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Carsten Bormann, 11:17
- RE: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Nelson, David, 11:05
- RE: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Dave Singer, 10:29
- Re: Audio streaming and slides suggestion, Allison Mankin, 10:19
- Audio streaming and slides suggestion, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 10:07
- RE: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Nelson, David, 09:57
- Bounces from nomcom05 mailing list?, Eric Rescorla, 09:09
- RE: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:18
November 10, 2005
- Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Lars Eggert, 20:56
- Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Bill Fenner, 19:55
- RE: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 18:38
- Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Marshall Eubanks, 18:34
- IAOC Chair request for Consensus Call, Lucy E. Lynch, 17:38
- Re: Thawte WOT at keysigning, Lars Eggert, 16:44
- Re: Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Joel Jaeggli, 16:28
- Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 16:08
- Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Joel Jaeggli, 15:58
- Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Carsten Bormann, 15:46
- RE: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Gray, Eric, 15:35
- Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Spencer Dawkins, 15:19
- Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Brett Thorson, 15:02
- RE: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Ole Jacobsen, 14:58
- RE: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Christian Huitema, 14:46
- Re: Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, John Loughney, 14:42
- Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 14:27
- RE: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Glenn Parsons, 12:50
- Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Joel Jaeggli, 12:38
- Re: Vancouver schedule, Marshall Eubanks, 12:36
- Re: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Henning Schulzrinne, 12:14
- Re: Vancouver schedule, David Partain, 12:07
- Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Pekka Nikander, 12:07
- Re: Vancouver schedule, Brian E Carpenter, 11:54
- Re: Vancouver schedule, Kurt D. Zeilenga, 11:42
- Re: Vancouver schedule, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 11:28
- Re: jabber rooms, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 11:10
- RE: Vancouver IETF network; bogus IPv6 RAs, Glenn Parsons, 10:48
- Re: Vancouver schedule, Bob Hinden, 10:48
- IETF64: phones, Henning Schulzrinne, 10:19
- Re: Vancouver schedule, John C Klensin, 10:15
- Re: Vancouver schedule, Alexey Melnikov, 10:12
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML, Bill Manning, 10:11
- Re: Vancouver schedule, Joerg Ott, 10:11
- Jonathan Rosenberg not re-upping for IAB, Jonathan Rosenberg, 09:57
- Re: Vancouver schedule, Scott W Brim, 09:54
- Re: Vancouver schedule, Aaron Falk, 09:33
- Re: Vancouver schedule, Dave Crocker, 09:14
- Re: Vancouver schedule, Joel Jaeggli, 09:05
- Re: Vancouver schedule, Marshall Eubanks, 08:59
- Re: Vancouver schedule, Spencer Dawkins, 08:55
- Re: Vancouver schedule, John C Klensin, 08:35
- IETF 20 years slides, Ole Jacobsen, 08:26
- Re: Vancouver schedule, Pete Resnick, 08:04
- Re: Vancouver schedule, Colin Perkins, 07:30
- RE: Vancouver schedule, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\), 07:17
- Re: Vancouver schedule, Hideki Sunahara, 01:19
- Re: Vancouver schedule, Ole Jacobsen, 01:04
- Vancouver schedule, Aaron Falk, 00:44
November 09, 2005
- Thawte WOT at keysigning, Andrew Daviel, 21:27
- Patrik is not re-upping for IAB, Patrik Fältström, 20:50
- Streaming for the Wednsday and Thursday plenaries..., Joel Jaeggli, 17:51
- Re: Vancouver IETF network; bogus IPv6 RAs, Simon Leinen, 16:34
- IETF 64 NOC, Glenn Parsons, 14:37
- RE: jabber rooms, Ed Juskevicius, 13:16
- RE: RFCs should be distributed in XML, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:03
- Re: jabber rooms, Joel Jaeggli, 11:23
- Vancouver IETF network; bogus IPv6 RAs [was: Re: jabber rooms], Simon Leinen, 11:12
- Re: jabber rooms, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 11:11
- Re: jabber rooms, Carsten Bormann, 10:50
- Re: jabber rooms, Bob Hinden, 10:39
- Re: jabber rooms, Bill Manning, 08:41
- Re: jabber rooms, John C Klensin, 07:35
November 08, 2005
- Re: jabber rooms, Andy Bierman, 20:46
- jabber rooms, Brian E Carpenter, 20:07
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML, Frank Ellermann, 19:24
- What you should wear to tonight's IETF64 Social, Ed Juskevicius, 15:41
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Andrew Newton, 12:29
- RE: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:28
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Anthony G. Atkielski, 11:28
- Re: Open standards for pictures (Was: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Anthony G. Atkielski, 11:20
- RE: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:43
- Notes from remote, Melinda Shore, 10:23
- RE: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Thomas Gal, 10:14
- Stepping down, Allison Mankin, 08:13
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 07:27
- Re: RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Andrew Newton, 06:40
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:56
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 02:46
- Open standards for pictures (Was: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:34
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:30
- RFCs should be distributed in XML (Was: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:29
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:28
November 07, 2005
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Anthony G. Atkielski, 21:36
- RE: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:20
- Re: IETF Budget FY06 #2, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 20:58
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Frank Ellermann, 20:37
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Frank Ellermann, 20:11
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Anthony G. Atkielski, 20:08
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Anthony G. Atkielski, 20:08
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Anthony G. Atkielski, 20:04
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Thomas Kuiper, 19:18
- RE: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:12
- IETF Budget FY06 #2, Ray Pelletier, 13:50
- IETF FY06 Budget, Ray Pelletier, 12:44
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Frank Ellermann, 12:34
- RE: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:33
- hotel wireless in Salons, Michael Richardson, 11:26
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Anthony G. Atkielski, 10:49
- RE: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:31
- Monday 0800 Streaming efforts for IETF64 redux, Joel Jaeggli, 09:39
- Error in pocket agenda, Brian E Carpenter, 08:23
- New OPS-AD needed, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 00:25
November 06, 2005
- Applications Area Director Selection, Scott Hollenbeck, 16:11
- Not re-applying for RTG AD position, Alex Zinin, 15:22
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, shogunx, 13:09
- RE: Taxi, nearby restaurants in Vancouver, Ed Juskevicius, 12:08
- Re: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 11:22
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 10:13
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Sam Hartman, 10:00
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Dave Crocker, 07:36
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, shogunx, 07:01
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Anthony G. Atkielski, 03:48
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Anthony G. Atkielski, 03:39
November 05, 2005
- Re: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria, Pekka Savola, 20:10
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, shogunx, 19:18
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Mohsen BANAN, 19:09
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Frank Ellermann, 18:54
- Re: Taxi, nearby restaurants, miaofuyou 19684, 18:37
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Frank Ellermann, 17:45
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Brian E Carpenter, 17:42
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Doug Royer, 17:03
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Ole Jacobsen, 16:53
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Mohsen BANAN, 15:38
- UTF-8, I hope [Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org], Brian E Carpenter, 11:02
- Taxi, nearby restaurants, Brian E Carpenter, 10:35
- For Sports Fans - already in Vancouver, Ed Juskevicius, 07:36
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Anthony G. Atkielski, 07:19
- from the horse's mouth - ISTF/ISSG, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 06:38
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Avri Doria, 06:12
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Ole Jacobsen, 01:27
- Re: Faux Pas -- web publication in proprietary formats at ietf.org, Anthony G. Atkielski, 01:01
November 02, 2005
- RE: from the horse's mouth, Candice Masters, 19:17
- Re: from the horse's mouth, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 18:54
- RE: from the horse's mouth, Gray, Eric, 10:45
- IAOC Office Hours - IETF 64, Lucy E. Lynch, 10:30
- RE: from the horse's mouth, Ole Jacobsen, 10:18
- Re: from the horse's mouth, Christian de Larrinaga, 10:14
- Re: from the horse's mouth, Dave Crocker, 10:12
- Re: from the horse's mouth, Steven M. Bellovin, 10:00
- RE: from the horse's mouth, Fleischman, Eric, 09:46
- Re: from the horse's mouth, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 07:47
- Re: from the horse's mouth, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 05:01
- Re: from the horse's mouth, Eliot Lear, 04:39
- Re: from the horse's mouth, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 03:35
November 01, 2005
- Re: from the horse's mouth, Eliot Lear, 22:27
- Re: from the horse's mouth, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 17:18
- IESG Projects Page, IESG Secretary, 14:50
- PESCI is not moving, Sam Hartman, 13:58
- Human Factors Design (was RE: from the horse's mouth), Nelson, David, 09:19
- Re: from the horse's mouth, Eliot Lear, 08:57
- RE: from the horse's mouth, Nelson, David, 08:45
- Re: from the horse's mouth, Christian de Larrinaga, 07:36
- RE: Oops, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06:49
- Call Home BoF @ IETF, Eliot Lear, 06:48
- RE: Oops, Gray, Eric, 06:39
- Re: Oops, Frank Ellermann, 04:15
- Re: Oops, codewarrior, 02:40
- Re: Oops, william(at)elan.net, 02:15
- Re: Oops, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 01:16
- Re: Oops, Frank Ellermann, 00:23