Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)

ietf

Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)

2005-11-14 23:08:33

Randy.Dunlap writes:

SVG was mentioned (as spec'd by w3.org IIRC).

So check out Inkscape:
  "using the  W3C standard Scalable Vector Graphics  (SVG) file format."

Available for multiple platforms.

  http://www.inkscape.org/


Using an open format that requires people to install special free software
is no different than using a proprietary format that requires people
to install special free software.  And if that is to be the case, PDF
is much more widespread than SVG.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Yaakov Stein Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Stewart Bryant Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Dave Crocker RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Gray, Eric RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Bob Braden Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Stewart Bryant Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Bob Braden Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Stewart Bryant Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), kent crispin Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Randy.Dunlap Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Anthony G. Atkielski <= Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Joe Touch Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Gary E. Miller Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Bill Fenner Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Anthony G. Atkielski Re: Diagrams, Frank Ellermann RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Yaakov Stein RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Lars-Erik Jonsson (LU/EAB) Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Stewart Bryant Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Masataka Ohta Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Stewart Bryant

Previous by Date:	Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Anthony G. Atkielski
Next by Date:	RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Yaakov Stein
Previous by Thread:	Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Randy.Dunlap
Next by Thread:	Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Joe Touch
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]