*>
*> Bob Braden wrote:
*>
*> > *>
*> > *> > It just struck me as odd that people were grousing about ASCII's
*> > *> appearance when PDF is available.
*> > *>
*> > *> People will stop complaining when the ASCII version is allowed to sa
*> > *> "see diagram in the PDF version".
*> > *>
*> > *> Y(J)S
*> > *>
*> >
*> > Huh? That has always been allowed. What am I missing?
*>
*> Please can we be quite clear on this - for the record:
*>
*> I can include a normative diagram in the .pdf version of an RFC
*> (that is too complex to produce in ASCII art), and say in the
*> normative text of the ASCII version the diagram you need to
*> implement this protocol is in the .pdf version of this RFC?
No, the .ps/.pdf is not allowed to be normative.
Bob Braden
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf