RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)

ietf

RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)

2005-11-14 11:42:58

It just struck me as odd that people were grousing about ASCII's

appearance when PDF is available.  

People will stop complaining when the ASCII version is allowed to say
"see diagram in the PDF version".

Y(J)S

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Yaakov Stein <= Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Stewart Bryant Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Dave Crocker RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Gray, Eric RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Bob Braden Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Stewart Bryant Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Bob Braden Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Stewart Bryant Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), kent crispin Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Randy.Dunlap Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Anthony G. Atkielski

Previous by Date:	Re: Vancouver schedule, Barry Leiba
Next by Date:	RE: Please make sure that you do not run your WLAN in ad hoc mode, Yaakov Stein
Previous by Thread:	On-site "Well Known Addresses", David Mitton
Next by Thread:	Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Stewart Bryant
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]