Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)

ietf

Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)

2005-11-14 12:48:02

People will stop complaining when ...


Right on the nail



I suspect you underestimate our ability to keep complaining.

d/
--

Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
<http://bbiw.net>

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Yaakov Stein Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Stewart Bryant Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Dave Crocker <= RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Gray, Eric RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Bob Braden Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Stewart Bryant Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Bob Braden Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Stewart Bryant Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), kent crispin Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Randy.Dunlap Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Anthony G. Atkielski Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Joe Touch Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Gary E. Miller

Previous by Date:	Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Jari Arkko
Next by Date:	Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Julian Reschke
Previous by Thread:	Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Stewart Bryant
Next by Thread:	RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Gray, Eric
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]