It is easy to give glib answers to the following questions, ignoring
many detailed issues. Easy, but suspect.
Bob Braden
The issues under discussion should be: (1) whether the RFC Editor
should publish RFCs in some XML-based structural document descriptor
language, (2) whether this should be in particular the DTD defined in
RFC 2629, (3) whether an XML version should be co-authoritative with an
ASCII version or should be primary or secondary to the ASCII version,
(4) if an XML version is to be published as authoritative, how to
ensure that it is correct and consistent with the ASCII version, if
any.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf