Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)

ietf

Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML)

2005-11-16 10:43:49

On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 12:29:40PM +0000, Stewart Bryant wrote:

If we think that ASCII art is all that is needed, perhaps - as an
experiment - we should forbid the use of anything other than
ASCII art in presentations at the next IETF?


Seconded.

All in favor?

-- 
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber           PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG

pgpf323CSH5vR.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), (continued) Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Anthony G. Atkielski Re: Diagrams, Frank Ellermann RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Yaakov Stein RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Lars-Erik Jonsson (LU/EAB) Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Stewart Bryant Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Masataka Ohta Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Stewart Bryant Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Masataka Ohta Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Marshall Eubanks Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Bob Braden Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Ted Faber <= RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Bob Braden RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: Diagrams, Frank Ellermann RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Gray, Eric Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Stewart Bryant RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Gray, Eric RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Yaakov Stein Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Masataka Ohta Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Marshall Eubanks

Previous by Date:	Re: On revising 3777 as in draft-klensin-recall-rev-00, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Next by Date:	RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Gray, Eric
Previous by Thread:	Re: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Bob Braden
Next by Thread:	RE: Diagrams (Was RFCs should be distributed in XML), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]