-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Sayre [mailto:sayrer(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 5:38 PM
To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Cc: Tim Bray; Keith Moore; nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de;
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: I-D file formats and internationalization
On 12/1/05, Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com> wrote:
On a point of information, most of the references I see in existing
RFCs are to sections in any case.
I suspect this is because almost everyone refers to an HTML
version in informal communication.
Why do you consider the TXT version to be authoritative if as you admit
the HTML version is the one that is read by reviewers and readers?
Meaning is the result of usage.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf