ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re declare SPF and Sender-ID to be Informational

2005-12-09 17:43:56
In <20051209221401(_dot_)9125(_dot_)qmail(_at_)xuxa(_dot_)iecc(_dot_)com> John 
Levine <johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com> writes:

I cannot find any evidence from RFC 2026 that there is any such
thing as an "IETF experiment" or "IETF-sanctioned experiment".

Me neither.  Since neither the SPF nor the Sender-ID crowds appear to
have any interest in modifying their specs, that doesn't sound like an
experiment to me, IETF or otherwise.

Well, I dunno.  I solicited comments on the SPF draft on several IETF
mailing lists a couple of times and made changes based on those
comments.

What exactly do you think needs to be changed with the SPF draft?


-wayne


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf