ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 'monotonic increasing'

2006-02-17 13:40:32
 In your previous mail you wrote:

   A "Dictionary of mathematics" offers both definitions, first
   what you found f(x) > f(y) for x > y.   Followed by the other
   definition f(x) >= f(y), where the first case would be called
   "strictly monotone".  I vaguely recall that "strict" (in the
   German version), it's not completely unusual.
   
=> in French we have the same thing: "monotone" is either
f(x) >= f(y) or f(x) <= f(y) for x > y and "strictement monotone"
is either f(x) > f(y) or f(x) < f(y) for x > y.

Regards

Francis(_dot_)Dupont(_at_)point6(_dot_)net

PS: the preliminary agenda for the next IETF is supposed to be published
today but is not yet on the IETF meeting page?

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>