Re: Guidance needed on well known ports

In general I agree with Phillip but not in this case due to the risks of
circular dependencies.

Eliot

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: Guidance needed on well known ports, (continued) RE: Guidance needed on well known ports, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Message not available RE: Guidance needed on well known ports, Joel M. Halpern Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Keith Moore Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Joe Touch Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Stephane Bortzmeyer RE: Guidance needed on well known ports, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Joe Touch Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Spencer Dawkins closing the port registry considered harmful (was Re: Guidance needed on well known ports), Keith Moore Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Eliot Lear <= Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Keith Moore Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Keith Moore Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Peter Dambier Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Noel Chiappa Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Steven M. Bellovin Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Peter Dambier Re: Guidance needed on well known ports, Steven M. Bellovin