With respect to the specific document that led to this discussion,
draft-ietf-ltru-matching, I have asked the WG members at
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg04975.html
as follws:
If anybody who has contributed would like their name to be mentioned,
or thinks that somebody else's name is missing, please don't hesitate
to say so, or to contact the editors or chairs directly.
I am not aware of any such requests up to now, but maybe my co-chair
or the editors have received some.
Just for completeness, and because this is due to a Last Call comment
brought up on this mailing list, I would like to extend the above request
to this list: If you think that you should be listed in the Acknowledgements
section of draft-ietf-ltru-matching, please contact the editors or
the chairs of the LTRU WG.
Regards, Martin.
At 17:02 06/06/07, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 03:58:15AM +0200,
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin <jefsey(_at_)jefsey(_dot_)com> wrote
a message of 13 lines which said:
- Appendix A - some names seem to be missing. I could quote a small
score of them?
I do not know if there are written rules about the "Acknowledgements"
or "Credits" section in a RFC. It seems quite variable between the
RFCs. I am mentioned in draft-ietf-ltru-matching-14 for what I regard
as a very small contribution and not in RFC 4408 where I feel that my
contribution is more substantive.
Anyway, these appendices are not normative and are only useful for
historical reasons and to brush the ego :-)
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
#-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp
mailto:duerst(_at_)it(_dot_)aoyama(_dot_)ac(_dot_)jp
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf