On Friday, June 23, 2006 05:24:11 PM -0400 Keith Moore <moore(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu>
wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:18:40 -0400
"Burger, Eric" <eburger(_at_)cantata(_dot_)com> wrote:
I would offer that in *some* groups the running code bar is reasonable.
I would have little objection to requiring running code as a test of
feasibility of a new idea. I would object strongly to an argument that
just because someone has running code, means it's a good indication of
adequacy of the protocol.
Specific examples aside, I agree. Running code should be a necessary
condition for something to progress, but not a sufficient one.
-- Jeffrey T. Hutzelman (N3NHS) <jhutz+(_at_)cmu(_dot_)edu>
Sr. Research Systems Programmer
School of Computer Science - Research Computing Facility
Carnegie Mellon University - Pittsburgh, PA
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf