Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dussea

  Actually, I remember sending a few emails with feedback on this  
and not getting any replies, and then I went on my honeymoon, so it  
wasn't quite on my mind for a while.
  I think that document is the way to go, even if all it ends up  
saying is something similar to what you have in the CalDAV draft.
        -wsv


On Jun 20, 2006, at 4:59 PM, Lisa Dusseault wrote:

> We basically tried that.  What it turned into was this <http:// 
> www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-whitehead-http-etag-00.txt> with  
> no consensus on the basic model or apparent drive to come to  
> consensus.  Got any feedback on that draft?

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf