Agh, replied to the wrong message there in case it was not obvious.
I was not suggesting using the subway in the hotel as an IPv6 platform.
-----Original Message-----
From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 3:52 PM
To: 'Ken Raeburn'; ietf Mailing List
Cc: wgchairs(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: IETF IPv6 platform configuration
If memory serves me right there is a subway terminal built
into the foundation of the Delta International. Where the
other end of the subway goes is another matter.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Raeburn [mailto:raeburn(_at_)MIT(_dot_)EDU]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 9:55 AM
To: ietf Mailing List
Cc: wgchairs(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: IETF IPv6 platform configuration
On Jun 11, 2006, at 20:00, IETF Secretariat wrote:
All,
As you’re all aware, on 06/06/06 NSS successfully launched IPv6
services for IETF Web, Mail, and FTP.
Has anyone had FTP work for them when not in "passive" mode
since this
configuration change was made?
My site's got a clunky old ftp-based mirror script in use which at
first glance doesn't seem to know anything about passive
mode, and it
hasn't fetched any new RFCs since a month ago. Running ftp
directly
(over ipv4, from a couple of machines, one of which has no ipv6
configuration and no recent software changes) doesn't work either,
commands like LIST get back "failed to establish connection"
immediately.
I'm probably going to throw away the mirror script anyway
and switch
to rsync, but I'm still curious to know whether this is some weird
problem with our configuration (maybe a surprise related to
the ipv6
changes?), or an intentional (but unannounced?) or unintentional
configuration change in ftp support at the server side....
Ken
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf