ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Meetings in other regions

2006-07-15 05:48:55
The question should be asked if participation would pick up if we went to latin 
america.

Also given the political situation a trip to Brazil might pre-empt some issues. 
If the timing of the approch was right (ie when the olympic bidding round is at 
its peak if Rio rebids) the authorities could be very obliging. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Fred Baker [mailto:fred(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com] 
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 11:04 AM
To: Scott W Brim
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; dassa(_at_)dhs(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: Meetings in other regions

The IETF should indeed meet where our participants come from. 
That was my initial comment (from the mike) on "are we from 
Latin America, Africa, or Antarctica?" I think that remains 
to be shown.

That said, I'll remind you of the demographics of this 
particular meeting, working from memory from the slide Brian 
showed Wednesday evening. It looked to me like this meeting 
was a tad less than half from North America, perhaps 20% from 
Japan and China, and most of the rest from Europe. That 
argues for roughly half of our meetings being in North 
America, a meeting every other year in Asia, and the rest in 
Europe. What Brian then has to ask is "what are the trend 
lines". My understanding from his behavior (we haven't 
actually had this
conversation) is that he thinks we are trending towards being 
roughly equally from those regions, and therefore is trying 
to distribute meetings roughly evenly among them.

On Jul 14, 2006, at 10:14 AM, Scott W Brim wrote:

On 07/14/2006 10:01 AM, Fred Baker allegedly wrote:
Once upon a time,
the guideline I followed was that about 1/6 of the IETF was from 
Europe, a smattering was from elsewhere, and the lion's share was 
from the US, so I scheduled a meeting every other year in 
Europe, the 
odd one in random places, and the lion's share in the US. Those 
statistics are essentially meaningless now.

Why are they meaningless?  The IETF should overwhelmingly 
meet where 
the participants are, wherever that might be.  I still like your 
algorithm.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>