ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...

2006-08-31 11:12:49
Michael StJohns wrote:
I agree with Phillip - there is no harm here.  If someone ineligible
had happened to be selected, they would have been immediately
disqualified and the next number on the list selected.  That's why you
actually ask for about 16 numbers  to be output when you run the
program which outputs the selection numbers.  There is no reason for a
reset.  (However, see my comments on volunteer associations).

Mike, it's not often, but you and I disagree on this one.  There were
two problems.  Don't forget that the list of volunteers was announced
along with the selection process.  I fully accept Andrew Lange's
explanation that a message got hung in the queue.  Never-the-less,
selection of our leadership should not be taken lightly.  When the
foul-up was discovered, the chair followed the procedure that was
documented.  Please let's recognize that Mr. Lange has erred on the side
of transparency.  I applaud his choice.

Eliot


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>