On 8/31/06 at 9:38 AM +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Full disclosure: My personal opinion, which I *did* give to Lynn and
Andrew when I became aware of this glitch, is that a reset is the
only way to be certain that the selection process is unbiased.
Brian, the fact that Andrew Cc'ed you on the issue was (IMO) not a
good idea in the first place, but given that your position is one of
those being selected, the fact that you expressed an opinion at all
was phenomenally irresponsible. Now, in addition to questions about
Andrew's motivations for doing the reset (the theoretical "Did he
want a 'do-over' because he didn't like the outcome?"), we also have
to contend with whether *you* influenced the process deliberately
because *you* didn't like the outcome. Unbelievably ill-advised on
your part.
I will refrain from giving my opinion on what Andrew should do at this point.
pr
--
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
QUALCOMM Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf