Mark, Sam,
It seems to me that a reference from the draft to the code
description or to Bind 9 more generally, with a note to the
effect that Bind 9 is believed to contain an implementation of
what is being described in the document, could head off a great
deal of confusion... including all of the confusion we have seen
in the last week or so.
john
--On Tuesday, 31 October, 2006 08:42 +1100 Mark Andrews
<Mark_Andrews(_at_)isc(_dot_)org> wrote:
The documents are essentially the same. In particular the
policy to resolve the handling of multiple dlv namespaces
which overlap is the same. This was not so in earlier
versions.
Mark
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf