Mark, Sam,
It seems to me that a reference from the draft to the code
description or to Bind 9 more generally, with a note to the
effect that Bind 9 is believed to contain an implementation of
what is being described in the document, could head off a great
deal of confusion... including all of the confusion we have seen
in the last week or so.
john
BIND 9 currently implements only a single DLV tree for ".".
The policy refects the intended state once lookups in
multiple DLV trees are supported.
--On Tuesday, 31 October, 2006 08:42 +1100 Mark Andrews
<Mark_Andrews(_at_)isc(_dot_)org> wrote:
The documents are essentially the same. In particular the
policy to resolve the handling of multiple dlv namespaces
which overlap is the same. This was not so in earlier
versions.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews(_at_)isc(_dot_)org
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf