Pekka,
At least two carriers, AT&T and Verizon support, "An EF DSCP for
Capacity-Admitted Traffic", Fred Baker, 6-Oct-06
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: Pekka Savola [mailto:pekkas(_at_)netcore(_dot_)fi]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 2:32 AM
To: Fred Baker
Cc: Sam Hartman; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; ieprep(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; Scott
Bradner
Subject: Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness
(ieprep)
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Fred Baker wrote:
We also specifically addressed their requirements (in tsvwg)
operationally:
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4594.txt
4594 Configuration Guidelines for DiffServ Service Classes. J.
Babiarz, K. Chan, F. Baker. August 2006. (Format: TXT=144044
bytes)
(Status: INFORMATIONAL)
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr
"Aggregation of DiffServ Service Classes", Kwok Ho Chan, 22-Oct-06
and
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-tsvwg-admitted-voice-dscp
"An EF DSCP for Capacity-Admitted Traffic", Fred Baker, 6-Oct-06
The last two are in last call and in discussion in tsvwg respectively.
All of these documents are, or are aimed at Informational. I do not
see how those could define DSCP codepoints or behaviour -- doing so
requires Standards Action and certain codepoint pools are reserved for
local/private use (which specifying them is not). I wonder how wide
IETF or operator consensus is behind this work.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf