Dave Crocker wrote:
...
So my suggestions are:
1. Move these Status pages out of the "tools" development area and make
them an official part of a working group's "official" pages.
That isn't simply a matter of wishing it to be so. It actually
involves work (to make the tools that generate these pages ready
to hand over) and expense (since this would be new work for
the Secretariat).
2. Make the header standard for *all* working-group specific pages.
3. Remove the documents list from the WG charter page, since it is
redundant with the Status page and less complete.
However, it contains different information - it "knows" which
drafts are official WG drafts, and it includes "obsoleted by/
updated by" information for RFCs.
There's also a whole other topic: what gets archived when
a WG is closed.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf