Brian E Carpenter wrote:
But, Brian, the concern for costs ought to extend much farther, such as to
the kinds of issues raised by an IESG Discuss so that the AD provides an
explanation of the benefit that justifies the considerable cost in delay
and wg effort they are imposing...
Hence the DISCUSS criteria document, which is a work in progress (and likely
to become an ION).
Brian,
Which document are you referring to?
The one that I thought you meant has an I-D Tracker status of "dead" and is no
longer an I-D:
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/idindex.cgi?command=id_detail&id=13314>
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf