On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 07:09:21 -0800
Michael Thomas <mat(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:
The other thing that occurs to me -- and I know this has been brought
up in many different forms -- is that if an AD _was_ following the
working group to some degree, why is it legitimate for them to wait
for IESG evaluation to voice comments that affect the protocol's
operation?
Most ADs don't follow most WGs in any detail -- they can't possibly do
so. They should (and generally do) follow their own WGs, possibly the
others in their area, plus one or two elsewhere that they're personally
interested in.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf