On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 07:21:55PM -0700,
Paul Hoffman <paul(_dot_)hoffman(_at_)vpnc(_dot_)org> wrote
a message of 35 lines which said:
Could you give an example of an WG in which this would have been
preferable?
MARID, certainly.
Yes, there are a few engineers in the IETF who like to play armchair
lawyer and would love to spend the initial time of WG formation
pontificating about IPR, but they are in the small minority. Such a
discussion would be of no interest to the folks who want to do good
technical work.
You mean that everyone who disagrees with the current IPR policy of
IETF is not wanting to do good technical work? And that people
genuinely interested in a better IPR policy are just "armchair
lawyers"? Seems quite despising.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf