Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil
2007-10-29 17:57:58
There are 2 people who own every right on computers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Babbage
and programming
http://www.agnesscott.edu/Lriddle/women/love.htm
All patents therafter are infringements of the work of
these two people.
Well even those two people built on the work of other people.
Kind regards
Peter and Karin Dambier
Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:02:10 -0700
"Lawrence Rosen" <lrosen(_at_)rosenlaw(_dot_)com> wrote:
Eric Burger wrote:
I specifically applied for patents underlying the technology behind
RFC 4722/RFC 5022 and RFC 4730 specifically to prevent third
parties, who are not part of the IETF process, from extracting
royalties from someone who implements MSCML or KPML.
That was a waste of your time and money. Publication of those
inventions by you, at zero cost to you and others, would have been
sufficient to prevent someone else from trying to patent them. Next
time, get good advice from a patent lawyer on how to achieve your
goals without paying for a patent.
You're obviously right in theory on this point. I wonder whether
you're right in practice. We've all seen far too many really bad
patents issued, ones where prior art is legion. The (U.S.) patent
office seems to do a far better job of searching its own databases than
it does the technical literature.
I know there are many philosophical reasons why many people oppose
software patents. But for others, there are very practical reasons:
there are too many bad patents issued. I think we can all agree that
stopping bad patents is a worthwhile goal, even if for some it's just
an intermediate goal.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
Peter and Karin Dambier
Cesidian Root - Radice Cesidiana
Rimbacher Strasse 16
D-69509 Moerlenbach-Bonsweiher
+49(6209)795-816 (Telekom)
+49(6252)750-308 (VoIP: sipgate.de)
mail: peter(_at_)peter-dambier(_dot_)de
mail: peter(_at_)echnaton(_dot_)arl(_dot_)pirates
http://iason.site.voila.fr/
https://sourceforge.net/projects/iason/
http://www.cesidianroot.com/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?, (continued)
- Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Sam Hartman
- Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Steven M. Bellovin
- RE: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Lawrence Rosen
- Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Keith Moore
- RE: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Lawrence Rosen
- Re: When is using patented technology appropriate?, Keith Moore
- Patents can be for good, not only evil, Eric Burger
- RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Lawrence Rosen
- Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil,
Peter Dambier <=
- RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Lawrence Rosen
- Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Steven M. Bellovin
- RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Ted Hardie
- RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Yaakov Stein
- RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Dave Crocker
- Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Byung-Hee HWANG
- RE: Patents can be for good, not only evil, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
|
|
|