This has nothing to do with an authority telling you what to do, but to
identify weakness, trends and communicate them to the rest of the IETF.
Up to the IETF to tackle the challenge or not.
Cheers
Ping Pan wrote:
Personally, I don’t believe in any “authority” telling me what’s
needed, what would be the future and what to do next. Necessity is the
mother of all invention. The market today needs to have the standard
protocols in a number of areas. IETF seems to be the right place to
get job done. ;-)
Best regards,
- Ping
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Franck Martin [mailto:franck(_at_)sopac(_dot_)org]
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 01, 2008 7:09 PM
*To:* Ping Pan
*Cc:* dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net; 'IETF discussion list'
*Subject:* Re: Deployment Cases
Isn't it the role of the IRTF/IAB/? to look at which areas should the
IETF put more effort into?
Is there some kind of vision, road map, looking forward?
A wish list, which would stay as a wish list pending people
willingness to work on the items.
I think there is a need to analyse orientations, like bringing an
outsider to speak to IETF to raise new issues, like at last IETF with
power and computing and the fact that wakeonlan does not work and
would be real useful: how much intelligence to put in the card to wake
up the PC only when needed and not every time someone send a packet to
the card.
Cheers
Ping Pan wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Crocker [mailto:dhc2(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 11:45 AM
From outside IETF:
XMPP
iSCSI
> MPLS
Dave,
MPLS is an IP technology that has been largely driven inside IETF. Millions
of users have benefited from the backbones running with MPLS protocols. It's
about 10-year old. MPLS has refined, modified and reused many other IETF
protocols, RSVP, OSPF, ISIS and BGP etc.
Also for the role of IETF, I think it should take a more active role in
creating standard protocols for the industry. One example comes to mind is
in the area of streaming video - way too many proprietary protocols today.
Another place that needs some serious help is P2P. The lack of standard in
those areas has negative impact to their growth.
Regards,
- Ping
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org <mailto:Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
Franck Martin
ICT Specialist
franck(_at_)sopac(_dot_)org <mailto:franck(_at_)sopac(_dot_)org>
SOPAC, Fiji
GPG Key fingerprint = 44A4 8AE4 392A 3B92 FDF9 D9C6 BE79 9E60 81D9 1320
"Toute connaissance est une reponse a une question" G.Bachelard
--
Franck Martin
ICT Specialist
franck(_at_)sopac(_dot_)org
SOPAC, Fiji
GPG Key fingerprint = 44A4 8AE4 392A 3B92 FDF9 D9C6 BE79 9E60 81D9 1320
"Toute connaissance est une reponse a une question" G.Bachelard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf