Necessity may be the mother of invention. But in order to invent we must know
to distinguish what is necessary from cool capabilities offered to us by the
technology.
Twitter is really, really cool. It also has the utility of a square tomato: A
solution to a problem few people know about and even fewer care about.
________________________________
From: Ping Pan [mailto:pingpan(_at_)pingpan(_dot_)org]
Sent: Tue 01/01/2008 11:00 PM
To: 'Franck Martin'
Cc: dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net; 'IETF discussion list'
Subject: RE: Deployment Cases
Personally, I don't believe in any "authority" telling me what's needed, what
would be the future and what to do next. Necessity is the mother of all
invention. The market today needs to have the standard protocols in a number of
areas. IETF seems to be the right place to get job done. ;-)
Best regards,
- Ping
________________________________
From: Franck Martin [mailto:franck(_at_)sopac(_dot_)org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 7:09 PM
To: Ping Pan
Cc: dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net; 'IETF discussion list'
Subject: Re: Deployment Cases
Isn't it the role of the IRTF/IAB/? to look at which areas should the IETF put
more effort into?
Is there some kind of vision, road map, looking forward?
A wish list, which would stay as a wish list pending people willingness to work
on the items.
I think there is a need to analyse orientations, like bringing an outsider to
speak to IETF to raise new issues, like at last IETF with power and computing
and the fact that wakeonlan does not work and would be real useful: how much
intelligence to put in the card to wake up the PC only when needed and not
every time someone send a packet to the card.
Cheers
Ping Pan wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Crocker [mailto:dhc2(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 11:45 AM
From outside IETF:
XMPP
iSCSI
> MPLS
Dave,
MPLS is an IP technology that has been largely driven inside IETF. Millions
of users have benefited from the backbones running with MPLS protocols. It's
about 10-year old. MPLS has refined, modified and reused many other IETF
protocols, RSVP, OSPF, ISIS and BGP etc.
Also for the role of IETF, I think it should take a more active role in
creating standard protocols for the industry. One example comes to mind is
in the area of streaming video - way too many proprietary protocols today.
Another place that needs some serious help is P2P. The lack of standard in
those areas has negative impact to their growth.
Regards,
- Ping
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
Franck Martin
ICT Specialist
franck(_at_)sopac(_dot_)org
SOPAC, Fiji
GPG Key fingerprint = 44A4 8AE4 392A 3B92 FDF9 D9C6 BE79 9E60 81D9 1320
"Toute connaissance est une reponse a une question" G.Bachelard
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf