Hi all,
Some of the reviews I have seen start with good things to say about the
document pointing about a few things that need to be fixed. Yoshi
pointed out one issue that he apparently missed during the WGLC. We
have been going back and forth on these topics and not really making
progress. Many, if not most of the folks, are also active in the HOKEY
WG and support the charter. Let us get together on a telecon sometime
next week, and resolve these pending issues. I will send an offline
request so we can figure out a time that works for all of us. Thanks.
I have seen one comment so far which declares clear opposition. I am
going to respond to that separately.
regards,
Lakshminath
On 2/3/2008 1:14 PM, Alan DeKok wrote:
Dan Harkins wrote:
Yea, mapping by Username might be better. Oone reason is that you
could develop a rational searching strategy to identify keys if you
indexed with something like "Username". That is a great suggestion and
a useful alternative to what is in the draft now. I would support such
a change.
It is also existing practice. The term "hotlining" refers to the
process of pro-actively kicking a user offline after they have
previously been authenticated.
ERX has to be able to support this practice. It has to be able to
delete *all* keys associated with a particular user/cui/session, so that
those keys can no longer be used to obtain network access.
Alan DeKok.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf