Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
NATs will be needed during the (long) transition period, including
some NATs dealing with both IPv6 and IPv4.
I don't see how the transition from IPv4 to IPv6 requires NAT in IPv6.
I am not advocating "v6 to v6 NATs", as confirmed by some of my earlier
messages that argue against.
But, if an IPv6-only client has to be able to reach an IPv4-only
server, I keep saying that some NATs will have to deal BOTH with IPv6
(client side) and IPv4 (server side).
As a matter of fact, your recent I-D on MNAT-PT does propose ways of
doing it.
With this clarification, I believe we are in agreement.
RD
|
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf