----- Original Message -----
From: "Julian Reschke" <julian(_dot_)reschke(_at_)gmx(_dot_)de>
To: "Tom.Petch" <sisyphus(_at_)dial(_dot_)pipex(_dot_)com>
Cc: "Stephane Bortzmeyer" <bortzmeyer(_at_)nic(_dot_)fr>; "ietf"
<ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: draft-duerst-iana-namespace-00.txt
Tom.Petch wrote:
Hm, we are talking about XML namespace names, not DTD URIs.
XML processors are not supposed to resolve them, so it seems strange to
insert requirements for clients that do so.
Welcome as this is, why is this I-D limited to XML namespace names? What
about
XML Schema names?
Pardon my ignorance, but what is an XML Schema name? I
As defined in RFC3688, which sets up namespaces for
XML namespaces
XML schema
XML rdfschema
XML publicid
all using the URI scheme urn:
Tom Petch
And is this not an update to RFC3688?
I'd consider it an alternative approach.
BR, Julian
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf