Re: IONs & discuss criteria

"Dave" == Dave Crocker <dhc2(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net> writes:


    Dave> Sam Hartman wrote:
    >> Making it a BCP will make the interpretation problem worse not better.


    Dave> How?

You can update an IESG statement mor easily than a BCP.  As you find
areas where the text is unclear and you have to interpret you can
actually go back and update the text.

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: IONs & discuss criteria, (continued) Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Dave Crocker Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Brian E Carpenter Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Lakshminath Dondeti Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Brian E Carpenter Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Ralph Droms Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Andrew Newton Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Brian E Carpenter Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Dave Crocker Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Spencer Dawkins Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Tim Polk Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Sam Hartman <= Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Ted Hardie Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Harald Tveit Alvestrand Re: IONs & discuss criteria, John C Klensin Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Pete Resnick Re: IONs & discuss criteria, John C Klensin Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Dave Crocker

Previous by Date:	Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-11.txt, Elwyn Davies
Next by Date:	sip call hold, d.giordano
Previous by Thread:	Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Tim Polk
Next by Thread:	Re: IONs & discuss criteria, Ted Hardie
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]