On Mar 6, 2008, at 7:10 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Sam Hartman wrote:
Making it a BCP will make the interpretation problem worse not
To some extent that depends on how carefully the putative BCP
is crafted, with "should" and when to disregard "should" being
What does this mean? Is it an argument that as a BCP the "shoulds"
carry weight whereas now they can be obeyed more conveniently? Or is
it a general comment regarding the futility of formalizing procedures?
IETF mailing list