+1 from me.
The role of the Trust Chair used to be pretty lightweight: either it
still is, and Harald's advice is sound (get clerical help), or it
no longer is, and a more detailed explanation of the experienced change
would be helpful to the community being asked for comment.
Leslie.
--On April 4, 2008 11:50:23 AM +0200 Harald Alvestrand
<harald(_at_)alvestrand(_dot_)no> wrote:
After considering the comments so far, I think I disagree with having a
separate Trust chair.
The idea behind making the IAOC be the Trustees was, among other things,
to make sure that we didn't create yet another nexus of control in the
labyrinth of committees; I understood the legal existence of the
Trustees as something different (in name) from the IAOC to be strictly
something we did for legal purposes
If the IAOC chair is overburdened by having to manage the IAOC in two
different contexts, get him (or her) a secretary.
I agree with John's comment that leaving the current trustees in charge
on dissolution of the IAOC is inappropriate; for one thing, that also
removes all the recall mechanisms.
Figure out something else to do in this case.
Harald
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf