Russ Housley said:
"I agree with this principle. In fact, I think that the IESG has taken many
steps over the last four or more years to reduce the nearly-end-of-process
surprises. Obviously, you do not think these measures have been sufficient. One
lesson from the many attempts to make updates to RFC 2026 is that such policy
documents needs to set expectations without taking away flexibility and
judgement. "
Can you elaborate on what steps the IESG has taken to reduce the
"nearly-end-of-process surprises" and why effect this has had, if any? For
example, have the delays resulting from IESG reviews actually *decreased* as a
result?
The research by Prof. Simcoe of the Rotman School is not encouraging:
http://www.rotman.utoronto.ca/strategy/research/working%20papers/Simcoe%20-%20Delays.pdf
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf