ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

2008-07-03 16:15:14

Mark Andrews wrote:

The Internet went to multi-label hostnames ~20 years ago.

As noted in RFC 2821 as "one dot required" syntax, also
mentioned in RFC 3696.  Recently *overruled* by 2821bis.

        There is a difference between allowing protocol to be used
        in a "local" only mode (single label) and a "global" mode
        (multi-label) and saying you must support single label in
        a global context.

        Single label names are local in scope.  Attempting to use
        them in a global context does not work.  As the names in
        "." get more interesting the probability of collisions with
        existing names goes up.  Not many people choose two letter
        labels for the least significant parts of their host names
        unless they are choosing their initials.

        Museum on the other hand is a real English word.  I'm sure
        you will find lots other uses of "museum" in the DNS.  The
        same thing will happen with other TLD's as the rules are
        relaxed.

        Single label hostnames are not globally unique.  They SHOULD
        NOT be used in a context where globally unique names are
        required.

        Mark
 
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews(_at_)isc(_dot_)org
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>