I think that at our level in the news food chain, it is wise to assume
that any
words said to journalists may be published regardless of our wishes or
promises received.
Regards
Marshall
On Jul 31, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Ted Faber wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 02:11:48PM -0400, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja(_at_)bogus(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Or you know not consenting to interviews with someone who's
professionalism
you don't respect. Why you would expect someone engaged in serious
journalism or otherwise to offer you the opportunity to modulate
your own
statements post facto is beyond me.
To change what was said, no. To ensure that it's taken in the
proper context, yes. It's done in the media every day.
I think it is unwise to assume that you will get an opportunity to
review a story before publication - let alone offer comments or
corrections - unless you have specifically negotiated that right
with the
reporter and perhaps their superiors. YMMV. IANAL.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf