ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New schemes vs recycling "http:" (Re: Past LC comments on draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-08)

2008-08-07 02:26:47
Patrik Fältström wrote:
...
FWIW: I agree with this. A URI is an identifier. Some of them might be possible to resolve using for example information given by the URI scheme, but that is definitely not a requirement. And it has never been one either.
...

Just for the record: I agree with this, and didn't say anything else.

BR, Julian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>