RE: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)

ietf

RE: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)

2008-09-15 14:35:11

We need
to have some cultural sophistication if we're going to ask Sue to run
against incumbent Bob openly, given that Sue's WG has documents waiting
for Bob's approval.


I think Bob would already know, in practice. So, I wonder if it makes a
difference whether this is a public knowledge, or a private knowledge.

Alper


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees), (continued) Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees), John C Klensin Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees), Pete Resnick Incumbent conflict of interest, Dave CROCKER Re: Incumbent conflict of interest, Melinda Shore RE: Incumbent conflict of interest, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: Incumbent conflict of interest, Michael StJohns RE: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees), Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees), ned+ietf Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees), Leslie Daigle RE: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees), Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees), Alper Yegin <= Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees), Peter Saint-Andre Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees), John C Klensin Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees), Marshall Eubanks Application Area nominations (Was: On being public), Alexey Melnikov

Previous by Date:	Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees), James M. Polk
Next by Date:	Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees), Peter Saint-Andre
Previous by Thread:	RE: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Next by Thread:	Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees), Peter Saint-Andre
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]