ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07

2009-02-12 14:19:19
Hi Melinda, 

On 2/12/09 1:16 PM, "Hannes Tschofenig" 
<Hannes(_dot_)Tschofenig(_at_)gmx(_dot_)net> wrote:
The main issue I have been struggeling with these authorization 
extensions inside TLS is that they happen at the wrong layer.

I don't know about that - I think it really depends on how the 
TLS session is being used, etc.

Sure. A good example of SAML usage is WebSSO. Using SAML in that usage
scenario requires a bit more than just carrying around the SAML assertion. 

 I think that the more ability 
traffic has to describe itself the better,

Not sure I understand that. 

and that there are 
some non-trivial advantages to carrying authorizations in-band.
Namely... 

Ciao
Hannes


Melinda

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf