Ole,
You're not mistaken - the standard "+" format is defined in ITU-T
Recommendation E.123 (http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-E.123/en).
- Lyman
On Apr 15, 2009, at 7:17 AM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
I don't think an RFC is needed. Unless I am mistaken, the + format,
leaving out leading 0s was introduced by CCITT (now ITU) in the "Red
Book" back in 1984, perhaps even in earlier works.
Ole
Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher, The Internet Protocol Journal
Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972 Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 14 apr 2009, at 16:37, IETF Secretariat wrote:
Be sure to make your reservation at one of the Stockholm hotels
the IETF
has a block of rooms held. Cutoff dates for the blocks are
relatively
early.
No kidding: some are next week.
Hotel information can be found at:
http://www.ietf.org/meetings/75/hotels.html
Some of the phone numbers have a (0) in there. Is this the
European (0) which
means "if you don't know that you sometimes have to remove that 0
you will get
some unlucky soul on the line who doesn't know why he gets so many
crank
calls" or the North American (xyz) which means it's a normal part
of the
number?
(My phone number in Holland used to be 31073... and it took me
years to figure
out why people would keep calling me over and over again when they
clearly
needed someone else. But this person apparently decided that +31(0)
73... was a
good way to write down their number +3173... / 073...)
Do we have an RFC for how to format phone numbers?
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf