ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [mif] WG Review: Multiple InterFaces (mif)

2009-04-23 13:06:22
This type of implementation is not transparent to application, kind of
binding everything together, what mif is trying to do is to avoid it.

thanks

-Hui


2009/4/23 Christian Huitema <huitema(_at_)windows(_dot_)microsoft(_dot_)com>:
(2) There is no way that these decisions can be made solely at the
transport or application layer, because source (and to a lesser degree
destination) address selection is tightly tied to the first-hop
forwarding decision.  The outbound interface, source address and default
router all have to be selected in a coordinate process, to avoid sending
traffic that will be discarded on the outbound path, due to router
filters.

Actually, applications can to do that today, using the socket API, if the 
stack implements the "strong host" model. The application just needs to bind 
the socket to a specific IP address. Doing that ensures that packets sourced 
by the application will use the specified address, will go out through the 
interface corresponding to that address, and will use the default gateway 
associated with that interface.

-- Christian Huitema



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf