On 2009-8-31, at 19:24, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
But the same could be said all our experimental and informational RFCs.
Should we insist that all experimental and informational RFC, even
from IETF WGs, carry big warnings "THIS IS NOT AN IETF STANDARD."
FWIW, this was exactly what I proposed a while ago. The current way we
label RFCs requires folks to understand the intricacies of the
different streams. Few in the broader industry do.
Lars
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf