Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)

Andrew G. Malis wrote:
> I appreciate the potential difficulty of guaranteeing the unencumbered
> status of any output of this group. However, I would like this statement to
> be stronger, saying that this group will only produce a new codec if it is
> strongly believed by WG rough consensus to either be unencumbered,
> or freely licensed by the IPR holder(s), if any.
For political reasons, this is unlikely to happen.  Instead, I hope you
will participate in the WG.  Then that rough consensus will depend on your
opinion (roughly).

--Ben

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf