+1 Emphatically
If people want to do the work, why not let them try.
If they cannot succeed then shut it down.
That does bring up the more sensitive subject that the IETF as a whole needs
to consider which is when can it be determined that a WG is not succeeding.
That is a much much longer thread.
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf
Of Sam Hartman
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 5:41 PM
To: Patrik Fältström
Cc: codec(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; Phillip Hallam-Baker;
iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org;
kre(_at_)munnari(_dot_)oz(_dot_)au; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
I've been thinking about the codec issue for a while. I think it is
really desirable for the IETF to charter this group. I don't think
the
charter should prohibit the working group from selecting some existing
codec nor should it prohibit doing new work in this space.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf