ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Public musing on the nature of IETF membership and employment status

2010-04-06 14:17:52
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Mark Atwood 
<me(_at_)mark(_dot_)atwood(_dot_)name> wrote:

Much of what makes the IETF work is how it is very different from other
standards bodies (such as IEEE, ANSI, ISO, NIST, ITU, etc etc).

One key difference is that "groups" do not join the IETF.


That's part of it but IEEE, for example, has some standards groups with
Individual membership (for example, both 802.1 and 802.11) and other
standards groups with entity membership.

It is just as big a difference, for the organizations that you list, that
they have reasonably precise rules for becoming a voting member and
maintaining that status, whether the members are individuals or entities.
For individuals, this usually involves meeting attendance and mandatory
response to letter ballots or the like. My status as a voting member of
802.1 and 802.11 is not affected by changes in my employment or affiliation.
Because voting membership is clearly defined, these organizations can do
things by ballot/voting.

The membership of the IETF or any particular IETF working group is not well
defined so decisions are made by some person or group (WG Chair, AD, IESG)
who is empowered to judge rough consensus.

Thanks,
Donald


Cisco, IBM, MCI, or Linden Lab are not "members" of the IETF.  No agency of
the US government, or of any other government, is a "member" of the IETF.
 No university, non-profit, PIRG, PAC, or other "concerned citizens group",
is a "member" of the IETF.

Only individual people can be "members" of the IETF.  And "membership" is
mostly defined as "who shows up on the mailing list" and "who shows up at
the meetings".

There have been many cases in the history of the IETF where well known
members who are in the middle of writing standards or of chairing various
important working groups, who have worked for well-known large companies,
will change employers, to other companies, to startups, or to personal
sabbaticals switch around between industry, academia, research, and
government, and this will not, does not, and should not, affect their
position inside the IETF at all.

It appears that sometimes people, inside and outside of the IETF, need to
be reminded of this.

If you want to write standards like the IEEE and ITU do it, you know where
you can find them.

But when you choose to participate in the IETF process, that is how it
works.

And if someone feels that anyone's change in employment status should
affect their standing in any part of the IETF process, that person has
missed the point, and needs to be pointedly reminded of their mistake.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>