ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3

2010-07-01 13:48:15
Hi Dan,

One of the starting points for this work is that more centralized
solutions to this problem have been defined (and implemented), yet
they have not been successful.  Per one of Christer's earllier
comments, we will add some text with reference to such and thus
substantiate why this group is focusing on a p2p based solution.

Thanks,
Mary.

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
<dromasca(_at_)avaya(_dot_)com> wrote:
It looks to me that one can imagine 'centralized' solutions which are
also based on reusing SIP related functionality developed in RAI. I
would rather not close such an option and allow the WG a window of
opportunity in which alternate solutions that could meet the same goals
can be presented.

Dan


-----Original Message-----
From: Mary Barnes [mailto:mary(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)barnes(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 6:24 PM
To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Cc: DISPATCH; IETF-Discussion list
Subject: Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3

Hi Dan,

The term peer to peer is intended to exclude mechanisms that
would use a central repository for the information:  This was
discussed in an earlier thread:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/current/msg02027.html

In one sense it is a solution, however, in another sense it
is reusing SIP related functionality defined in RAI and thus
is in a similar vein as specifying the use of SIP in a charter.

Thanks,
Mary.

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
<dromasca(_at_)avaya(_dot_)com> wrote:
The VIPR WG will address this problem by developing a peer to peer
based approach to finding domains that claim to be
responsible for a
given phone number and validation protocols to ensure a reasonable
likelihood that a given domain actually is responsible for
the phone
number.

Hi,

Clarification question. What exactly means 'peer to peer
based approach'
and what kind of approaches are excluded by having this in
the charter.
Does 'approach' mean solution? If so why does a specific type of
solution need to be agreed in the charter, while all we
have at hand
at this point are individual contribution I-Ds that describe the
'problem statement and some possible starting points for solutions'?

Thanks and Regards,

Dan


-----Original Message-----
From: dispatch-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:dispatch-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Mary Barnes
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 8:38 PM
To: DISPATCH
Subject: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3




_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf